H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mike Estep vs Pat Cramer H2H: 0-2
Pat Cramer holds a 2–0 lead over Mike Estep in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pat Cramer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pat Cramer won the 1973 Seattle third round 4-6 7-5 DEF.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1973* | Seattle | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pat Cramer | 4-6 7-5 DEF | Mike Estep | Match data |
| Jul 2, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Pat Cramer | 9-8 6-4 9-7 | Mike Estep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Estep | #409 | #59 | 0 | 1,760 | 120 | 184 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Estep | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #81 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #212 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #93 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |