H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Estep vs Tom Okker H2H: 0-3
Tom Okker holds a 3–0 lead over Mike Estep in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1974 Rotterdam third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1974* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-3 6-4 | Mike Estep | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1974* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tom Okker | 7-6(3) 6-7 7-6(1) | Mike Estep | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1972* | Los Angeles Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tom Okker | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Mike Estep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Estep | #409 | #59 | 0 | 1,760 | 120 | 184 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Estep | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1975 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1976 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #81 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1977 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #212 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | 1982 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #93 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |