H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Leach vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 1-1
Mike Leach and Francisco Gonzalez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mike Leach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Gonzalez won the 1984 Brisbane quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1984* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Francisco Gonzalez | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Mike Leach | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1984* | Cleveland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mike Leach | 6-3 7-5 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Leach | #999 | #29 | 0 | 1,784 | 73 | 102 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Leach | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #372 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #115 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #241 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |