H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 1-1
Mikhail Kukushkin and Andreas Seppi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on clay, while Mikhail Kukushkin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Kukushkin won the 2013 Moscow semifinal 6-1 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2022* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Mikhail Kukushkin | 6-2 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2021 | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | Q2 | Grass | Mikhail Kukushkin | 6-2 7-5 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2013* | Moscow | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mikhail Kukushkin | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| May 31, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Andreas Seppi | 6-7(5) 6-2 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Kukushkin | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |