H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Kukushkin vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0

Mikhail Kukushkin holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Kukushkin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Kukushkin won the 2016 Indian Wells Open first round 7-6(1) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Kukushkin
Kazakhstan Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mikhail Kukushkin #77 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 Daniel Munoz de la Nava #576 Match data May 7, 2017* Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Mikhail Kukushkin #90 7-6(1) 6-2 Daniel Munoz de la Nava #69 Match data Mar 12, 2016* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Kukushkin #336 #39 1,075 1,907 145 220 39.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daniel Munoz de la Nava #1,384 #68 732 1,761 9 28 24.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Daniel Munoz de la Nava
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #218 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 3–4 42.9% #148 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 5–6 45.5% #132 1,689 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 11–8 57.9% #59 1,810 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2011 7–20 25.9% #91 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2012 10–14 41.7% #107 1,701 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2013 6–5 54.5% #67 1,779 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2014 15–24 38.5% #70 1,802 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #179 1,532 0 0
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #65 1,753 0 1 2009 0–2 0.0% #216 1,585 0 0
28 2016 11–20 35.5% #89 1,662 0 1 2010 1–1 50.0% #147 1,621 0 0
29 2017 10–14 41.7% #74 1,734 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #140 1,581 0 0
30 2018 19–21 47.5% #53 1,834 0 1 2012 3–4 42.9% #171 1,649 0 0
31 2019 19–25 43.2% #67 1,796 0 1 2013 2–5 28.6% #194 1,698 0 0
32 2020 6–9 40.0% #89 1,744 0 1 2014 0–1 0.0% #206 1,665 0 0
33 2021 3–12 20.0% #182 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 1–7 12.5% #188 1,666 0 1 2016 3–13 18.8% #351 1,508 0 0
35 2023 1–2 33.3% #264 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2024 2–3 40.0% #113 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #298 1,523 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 5 13 18 27.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 12 13 25 48.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 8 13 21 38.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2018 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 14 15 29 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 137 241 43.2% 27 57 84 32.1% 14 25 39 35.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — 3 7 10 30.0% 6 21 27 22.2% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/365 of Mikhail Kukushkin's and 37/37 of Daniel Munoz de la Nava's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 1/1 5.0 1.0 72.6% 77.8% 35.3% 60.0% — 66.1% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 6/7 3.8 2.2 58.2% 67.5% 53.6% 56.7% 58.5% 61.5% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 11/11 3.3 2.1 56.2% 65.7% 50.1% 49.8% 39.9% 58.9% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 19/19 4.2 1.3 59.0% 67.7% 55.0% 60.8% 46.9% 62.0% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 27/27 3.8 2.3 56.3% 65.1% 50.3% 56.5% 37.2% 58.5% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 23/24 3.4 1.8 59.1% 61.6% 51.5% 50.2% 46.5% 57.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 11/11 5.0 2.4 54.7% 69.8% 48.0% 49.5% 56.8% 60.0% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 39/39 3.9 1.5 60.1% 68.0% 52.2% 58.5% 37.5% 61.6% 36.3% 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 55.9% 54.5% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 44.1% 41.1%
27 2015 39/39 2.9 1.8 58.2% 66.6% 53.7% 54.9% 42.0% 61.0% 34.7% 2009 2/2 4.5 3.0 58.7% 79.8% 35.2% 14.3% 48.8% 62.0% 36.3%
28 2016 30/31 2.6 1.5 59.1% 64.9% 48.1% 57.1% 43.1% 57.9% 36.8% 2010 2/2 3.5 1.5 55.5% 69.6% 51.6% 63.9% 56.7% 61.8% 32.1%
29 2017 24/24 3.1 1.0 66.5% 67.3% 52.3% 60.4% 49.3% 62.0% 39.2% 2011 1/1 5.0 5.0 52.8% 53.2% 47.6% 41.7% 44.4% 50.6% 41.8%
30 2018 40/40 2.5 1.3 64.3% 66.1% 54.0% 58.7% 38.1% 61.5% 37.3% 2012 7/7 1.0 3.1 58.0% 63.2% 44.0% 56.0% 47.4% 55.7% 42.7%
31 2019 44/44 2.7 1.1 65.1% 65.6% 52.5% 61.3% 37.3% 61.0% 34.9% 2013 7/7 2.9 4.0 54.0% 69.2% 51.2% 59.6% 23.8% 60.8% 31.9%
32 2020 15/15 3.3 1.9 62.1% 63.7% 51.8% 59.5% 50.9% 59.2% 37.4% 2014 1/1 4.0 7.0 61.7% 59.1% 48.8% 61.5% 66.7% 55.1% 29.9%
33 2021 13/15 3.3 1.8 62.6% 61.9% 47.4% 47.2% 51.4% 56.4% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 8/8 1.9 0.8 64.7% 61.7% 55.5% 61.7% 51.0% 59.4% 31.2% 2016 16/16 3.5 4.3 58.2% 66.2% 50.5% 62.0% 35.1% 59.3% 34.7%
35 2023 3/3 1.3 1.3 67.7% 61.8% 51.3% 59.6% 75.0% 58.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 5/5 2.8 1.4 65.1% 65.2% 43.2% 56.2% 51.0% 57.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 5.0 1.5 58.5% 61.0% 55.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.5% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 360/365 3.2 1.6 61.0% 65.7% 51.8% 57.0% 43.2% 60.1% 36.2% — 37/37 2.9 3.8 57.1% 66.3% 48.0% 57.1% 38.5% 58.4% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1514 108.6 -0.19 -1.28 0.868 46.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1594 118.2 -0.73 -0.47 0.922 48.2% +4 -5 — 47.1% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1690 125.6 -1.69 +0.10 0.925 48.7% -7 -26 — 48.1% -0.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1810 136.6 -0.27 +0.51 0.983 49.8% +39 -181 — 52.3% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1658 131.2 -3.55 -0.42 0.885 47.7% +27 -73 -95 34.3% -0.84 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1702 134.5 -3.20 -0.30 0.857 47.1% +46 -36 -199 47.0% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1780 133.2 -1.06 +0.50 0.965 49.7% +42 — — 58.1% +0.03 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.26 2007 1482 103.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 1803 148.2 -1.61 +0.57 0.946 48.9% +22 -199 -216 45.1% -0.23 7–9 (44%) 9–14 (39%) — -0.93 2008 1533 109.1 -0.08 -4.07 0.734 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
27 2015 1753 147.7 -2.51 -0.39 0.890 48.0% +76 -207 -171 42.7% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84 2009 1585 116.4 -1.87 -0.33 0.957 49.0% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.14
28 2016 1662 134.2 -3.89 -0.18 0.875 47.6% +22 -74 — 39.3% -0.92 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.65 2010 1622 114.8 -1.38 +2.12 0.841 46.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.03
29 2017 1735 138.8 -0.98 +1.79 1.031 50.6% +23 -116 — 46.9% +0.05 0–4 (0%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.06 2011 1582 112.3 +0.84 -1.89 0.845 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.32
30 2018 1835 143.4 -1.98 +0.98 0.969 49.6% -8 -211 -150 47.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.10 2012 1650 128.4 -1.16 +1.19 0.964 49.3% — +75 — 41.2% -0.47 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.05
31 2019 1796 144.9 -2.31 -1.00 0.895 48.3% -8 -215 -34 45.3% -0.30 3–3 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.34 2013 1699 128.4 -1.53 -1.91 0.813 46.9% -1 — — 30.0% -1.40 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.64
32 2020 1745 128.3 -1.83 -0.48 0.916 48.6% -28 — — 40.9% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.63 2014 1665 113.3 -1.03 +0.40 0.665 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.09
33 2021 1608 117.2 -3.86 -3.07 0.733 44.7% +27 — — 23.7% -1.71 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.47 2015 1568 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1666 132.3 -1.03 -1.64 0.769 45.6% +39 — — 20.0% -1.65 0–2 0–2 — -1.16 2016 1509 118.8 -2.81 -1.89 0.853 46.8% +140 +10 — 31.8% -1.20 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.60
35 2023 1662 110.5 -2.43 -3.27 0.697 44.5% +27 — — 50.0% +0.84 1–1 0–2 — +0.28 2017 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1603 111.1 -2.06 -1.03 0.855 47.6% +53 — — 36.4% -1.00 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.38 2018 1445 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1523 100.5 -1.47 +0.05 0.759 45.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1502 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.1 -2.22 -0.11 0.908 48.3% +22 -134 -132 43.2% -0.44 43–64 (40%) 66–83 (44%) 94.8 -0.62 — 1762 123.5 -1.91 -1.01 0.863 47.2% +62 +34 — 33.0% -1.14 6–12 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.