H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mikhail Kukushkin vs James Blake H2H: 1-1
Mikhail Kukushkin and James Blake are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Kukushkin won the 2011 Basel fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2011* | Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Kukushkin | 6-3 6-4 | James Blake | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2011 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | James Blake | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-0 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2011* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | James Blake | 7-5 6-1 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Kukushkin | James Blake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |