H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 1-1
Mikhail Kukushkin and Janko Tipsarevic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on grass, while Mikhail Kukushkin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2011 Eastbourne fourth round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2011* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 7-6(2) | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2010* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mikhail Kukushkin | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Kukushkin | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |