H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Kukushkin vs John Isner H2H: 1-4

John Isner holds a 4–1 lead over Mikhail Kukushkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Kukushkin won the 2019 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-7(3) 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Kazakhstan Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mikhail Kukushkin #58 6-4 6-7(3) 4-6 6-1 6-4 John Isner #12 Match data
Nov 1, 2018* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard John Isner #9 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) Mikhail Kukushkin #54 Match data
Mar 12, 2017* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #22 7-6(0) 7-6(6) Mikhail Kukushkin #90 Match data
Aug 21, 2014* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #15 6-1 7-6(3) Mikhail Kukushkin #50 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay John Isner #11 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-3 7-6(4) Mikhail Kukushkin #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Kukushkin #316 #39 1,075 1,907 144 218 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #218 1,513 0 0
20 2008 3–4 42.9% #148 1,593 0 0
21 2009 5–6 45.5% #132 1,690 0 0
22 2010 11–8 57.9% #59 1,809 0 1 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2011 7–20 25.9% #91 1,659 0 1 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2012 10–13 43.5% #107 1,708 0 1 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2013 6–5 54.5% #67 1,783 0 1 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2014 15–24 38.5% #70 1,803 0 1 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #65 1,752 0 1 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2016 11–20 35.5% #89 1,656 0 1 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2017 10–14 41.7% #74 1,731 0 1 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2018 19–21 47.5% #53 1,834 0 1 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2019 19–25 43.2% #67 1,796 0 1 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 2020 6–9 40.0% #89 1,744 0 1 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 2021 2–11 15.4% #182 1,599 0 1 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 2022 1–7 12.5% #188 1,663 0 1 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 2023 1–2 33.3% #264 1,660 0 1 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2024 2–3 40.0% #113 1,603 0 1 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #298 1,527 0 1 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16