H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Nicolas Lapentti
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Mikhail Kukushkin vs Nicolas Lapentti.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Kukushkin | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |