H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Kukushkin vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 1-1

Mikhail Kukushkin and Tommy Robredo are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay, while Mikhail Kukushkin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 Barcelona Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Kukushkin
Kazakhstan Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Robredo #20 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Kukushkin #54 Match data Apr 23, 2015* R32 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Mikhail Kukushkin #85 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) Tommy Robredo #20 Match data Oct 7, 2014* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Kukushkin #336 #39 1,075 1,907 145 220 39.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #218 1,513 0 0 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2008 3–4 42.9% #148 1,593 0 0 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1
21 2009 5–6 45.5% #132 1,689 0 0 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1
22 2010 11–8 57.9% #59 1,810 0 1 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2
23 2011 7–20 25.9% #91 1,658 0 1 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2
24 2012 10–14 41.7% #107 1,701 0 1 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4
25 2013 6–5 54.5% #67 1,779 0 1 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2014 15–24 38.5% #70 1,802 0 1 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #65 1,753 0 1 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9
28 2016 11–20 35.5% #89 1,662 0 1 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2017 10–14 41.7% #74 1,734 0 1 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10
30 2018 19–21 47.5% #53 1,834 0 1 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10
31 2019 19–25 43.2% #67 1,796 0 1 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12
32 2020 6–9 40.0% #89 1,744 0 1 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12
33 2021 3–12 20.0% #182 1,608 0 1 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12
34 2022 1–7 12.5% #188 1,666 0 1 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12
35 2023 1–2 33.3% #264 1,662 0 1 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2024 2–3 40.0% #113 1,602 0 1 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #298 1,523 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Tommy Robredo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2007 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2009 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2010 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2011 5 13 18 27.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2013 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2015 12 13 25 48.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2016 8 13 21 38.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 14 15 29 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
33 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
36 2024 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 137 241 43.2% 27 57 84 32.1% 14 25 39 35.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/365 of Mikhail Kukushkin's and 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Tommy Robredo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1%
19 2007 1/1 5.0 1.0 72.6% 77.8% 35.3% 60.0% — 66.1% 29.4% 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7%
20 2008 6/7 3.8 2.2 58.2% 67.5% 53.6% 56.7% 58.5% 61.5% 35.5% 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1%
21 2009 11/11 3.3 2.1 56.2% 65.7% 50.1% 49.8% 39.9% 58.9% 38.0% 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1%
22 2010 19/19 4.2 1.3 59.0% 67.7% 55.0% 60.8% 46.9% 62.0% 37.4% 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9%
23 2011 27/27 3.8 2.3 56.3% 65.1% 50.3% 56.5% 37.2% 58.5% 36.7% 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5%
24 2012 23/24 3.4 1.8 59.1% 61.6% 51.5% 50.2% 46.5% 57.2% 36.7% 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5%
25 2013 11/11 5.0 2.4 54.7% 69.8% 48.0% 49.5% 56.8% 60.0% 38.6% 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7%
26 2014 39/39 3.9 1.5 60.1% 68.0% 52.2% 58.5% 37.5% 61.6% 36.3% 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8%
27 2015 39/39 2.9 1.8 58.2% 66.6% 53.7% 54.9% 42.0% 61.0% 34.7% 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9%
28 2016 30/31 2.6 1.5 59.1% 64.9% 48.1% 57.1% 43.1% 57.9% 36.8% 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1%
29 2017 24/24 3.1 1.0 66.5% 67.3% 52.3% 60.4% 49.3% 62.0% 39.2% 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8%
30 2018 40/40 2.5 1.3 64.3% 66.1% 54.0% 58.7% 38.1% 61.5% 37.3% 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8%
31 2019 44/44 2.7 1.1 65.1% 65.6% 52.5% 61.3% 37.3% 61.0% 34.9% 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0%
32 2020 15/15 3.3 1.9 62.1% 63.7% 51.8% 59.5% 50.9% 59.2% 37.4% 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2%
33 2021 13/15 3.3 1.8 62.6% 61.9% 47.4% 47.2% 51.4% 56.4% 32.0% 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4%
34 2022 8/8 1.9 0.8 64.7% 61.7% 55.5% 61.7% 51.0% 59.4% 31.2% 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2%
35 2023 3/3 1.3 1.3 67.7% 61.8% 51.3% 59.6% 75.0% 58.1% 29.2% 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1%
36 2024 5/5 2.8 1.4 65.1% 65.2% 43.2% 56.2% 51.0% 57.4% 36.5% 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0%
37 2025 2/2 5.0 1.5 58.5% 61.0% 55.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.5% 31.5% 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3%
Career — 360/365 3.2 1.6 61.0% 65.7% 51.8% 57.0% 43.2% 60.1% 36.2% — 853/878 3.7 2.3 64.7% 69.7% 52.4% 58.2% 43.2% 63.4% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Kukushkin Tommy Robredo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14
19 2007 1514 108.6 -0.19 -1.28 0.868 46.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.24 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — +1.44
20 2008 1594 118.2 -0.73 -0.47 0.922 48.2% +4 -5 — 47.1% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.25
21 2009 1690 125.6 -1.69 +0.10 0.925 48.7% -7 -26 — 48.1% -0.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.05
22 2010 1810 136.6 -0.27 +0.51 0.983 49.8% +39 -181 — 52.3% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.77 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) — 0.00
23 2011 1658 131.2 -3.55 -0.42 0.885 47.7% +27 -73 -95 34.3% -0.84 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.22 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — +1.57
24 2012 1702 134.5 -3.20 -0.30 0.857 47.1% +46 -36 -199 47.0% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.54 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.81
25 2013 1780 133.2 -1.06 +0.50 0.965 49.7% +42 — — 58.1% +0.03 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.26 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — +3.75
26 2014 1803 148.2 -1.61 +0.57 0.946 48.9% +22 -199 -216 45.1% -0.23 7–9 (44%) 9–14 (39%) — -0.93 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.66
27 2015 1753 147.7 -2.51 -0.39 0.890 48.0% +76 -207 -171 42.7% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) — +2.30
28 2016 1662 134.2 -3.89 -0.18 0.875 47.6% +22 -74 — 39.3% -0.92 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.65 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.62
29 2017 1735 138.8 -0.98 +1.79 1.031 50.6% +23 -116 — 46.9% +0.05 0–4 (0%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.06 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.04
30 2018 1835 143.4 -1.98 +0.98 0.969 49.6% -8 -211 -150 47.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.10 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13
31 2019 1796 144.9 -2.31 -1.00 0.895 48.3% -8 -215 -34 45.3% -0.30 3–3 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.34 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.69
32 2020 1745 128.3 -1.83 -0.48 0.916 48.6% -28 — — 40.9% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.63 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) — +0.70
33 2021 1608 117.2 -3.86 -3.07 0.733 44.7% +27 — — 23.7% -1.71 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.47 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.91
34 2022 1666 132.3 -1.03 -1.64 0.769 45.6% +39 — — 20.0% -1.65 0–2 0–2 — -1.16 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56
35 2023 1662 110.5 -2.43 -3.27 0.697 44.5% +27 — — 50.0% +0.84 1–1 0–2 — +0.28 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84
36 2024 1603 111.1 -2.06 -1.03 0.855 47.6% +53 — — 36.4% -1.00 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.38 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31
37 2025 1523 100.5 -1.47 +0.05 0.759 45.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.03 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
38 2026 1502 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08
Career — 1908 141.1 -2.22 -0.11 0.908 48.3% +22 -134 -132 43.2% -0.44 43–64 (40%) 66–83 (44%) 94.8 -0.62 — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.