H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Mikhail Ledovskikh vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 0-1
Somdev Devvarman holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Ledovskikh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Somdev Devvarman won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur third round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Mikhail Ledovskikh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Ledovskikh | #1,768 | #151 | 287 | 1,599 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Ledovskikh | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #505 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #353 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |