H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 5-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–3 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Andreas Seppi leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2018 Budapest fourth round 6-1 6-2.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 2018* Budapest ATP 250 R16 Clay Andreas Seppi #55 6-1 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #100 Match data
Feb 8, 2018* Sofia ATP 250 R32 Hard Andreas Seppi #77 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #92 Match data
Aug 13, 2014* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #25 6-3 6-4 Andreas Seppi #52 Match data
Apr 15, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andreas Seppi #35 6-3 7-6(4) Mikhail Youzhny #15 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #62 7-6(2) 6-3 Andreas Seppi #36 Match data
Jul 23, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #16 7-6(1) 6-2 Andreas Seppi #35 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #14 4-6 7-5 6-3 7-6(4) Andreas Seppi #48 Match data
May 10, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #38 6-2 7-6(7) Andreas Seppi #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3