H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Andy Roddick H2H: 2-3

Andy Roddick holds a 3–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2006 US Open semifinal 6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(3) 6-3.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 10, 2006* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Andy Roddick #10 6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(3) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #54 Match data
Aug 21, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Andy Roddick #5 2-6 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #26 Match data
Jan 22, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Andy Roddick #10 6-7(4) 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #31 Match data
Oct 17, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #44 6-3 6-4 Andy Roddick #13 Match data
Jun 13, 2001* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #84 7-6(5) 6-3 Andy Roddick #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,177 577 196 74.6% 1 5 0 4 22 32

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Andy Roddick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,855 0 3
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,923 0 5
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,092 1 11
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2004 66–15 81.5% #2 2,078 1 15
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,031 1 20
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 1,998 1 21
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,008 1 26
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,046 1 27
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,988 1 29
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,024 1 30
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2012 22–12 64.7% #39 1,987 1 32
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10