H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Antony Dupuis H2H: 3-3

Mikhail Youzhny and Antony Dupuis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on grass, while Antony Dupuis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2004 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 6-0.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2004* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #36 6-4 6-0 Antony Dupuis #93 Match data
Feb 14, 2004* Milan ATP 250 QF Carpet Antony Dupuis #97 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #55 Match data
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Antony Dupuis #64 5-7 6-4 3-6 6-3 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #36 Match data
Apr 13, 2002* Casablanca ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #75 7-6(5) 6-2 Antony Dupuis #73 Match data
Sep 13, 2001* Tashkent ATP 250 R32 Hard Antony Dupuis #57 7-5 5-7 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #53 Match data
Jun 29, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #85 7-6(7) 6-3 6-2 Antony Dupuis #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Antony Dupuis #1,333 #57 661 1,686 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Antony Dupuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 1996 1–1 50.0% #319 1,513 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 1999 9–10 47.4% #83 1,598 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2000 4–13 23.5% #103 1,533 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2001 11–20 35.5% #90 1,559 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2002 14–23 37.8% #70 1,549 0 0
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2003 17–22 43.6% #78 1,598 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2004 17–21 44.7% #79 1,598 0 1
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2005 7–14 33.3% #150 1,604 0 1
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2006 2–2 50.0% #297 1,567 0 1
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2007 4–2 66.7% #197 1,616 0 1
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10