H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Antony Dupuis H2H: 3-3

Mikhail Youzhny and Antony Dupuis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on grass, while Antony Dupuis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2004 Libéma Open round of 32 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Antony Dupuis
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mikhail Youzhny #36 6-4 6-0 Antony Dupuis #93 Match data Jun 17, 2004* R32 Libéma Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Antony Dupuis #97 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #55 Match data Feb 14, 2004* QF Milan International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Antony Dupuis #64 5-7 6-4 3-6 6-3 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #36 Match data Aug 27, 2003* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #75 7-6(5) 6-2 Antony Dupuis #73 Match data Apr 13, 2002* QF Casablanca ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Antony Dupuis #57 7-5 5-7 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #53 Match data Sep 13, 2001* R32 Tashkent ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #85 7-6(7) 6-3 6-2 Antony Dupuis #69 Match data Jun 29, 2001* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Antony Dupuis #1,333 #57 661 1,686 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Antony Dupuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2 1996 1–1 50.0% #319 1,513 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4 1999 9–10 47.4% #83 1,583 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5 2000 4–13 23.5% #103 1,526 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7 2001 11–20 35.5% #90 1,557 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7 2002 14–23 37.8% #70 1,549 0 0
30 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8 2003 17–22 43.6% #78 1,598 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10 2004 17–21 44.7% #79 1,598 0 1
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10 2005 7–14 33.3% #150 1,607 0 1
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2006 2–2 50.0% #297 1,569 0 1
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10 2007 4–2 66.7% #197 1,617 0 1
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Antony Dupuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1999 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 4 7 11 36.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2002 10 11 21 47.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 1 6 83.3%
32 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
35 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5% — 41 60 101 40.6% 20 38 58 34.5% 19 22 41 46.3% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's and 200/214 of Antony Dupuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Antony Dupuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7% 1996 2/2 5.0 4.0 48.9% 72.2% 41.9% 50.0% 38.6% 56.5% 36.3%
24 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8% 1999 15/19 8.1 2.8 60.2% 73.4% 52.7% 71.6% 52.0% 65.1% 35.6%
27 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7% 2000 14/17 7.9 2.4 56.7% 70.4% 52.5% 67.4% 33.6% 62.4% 31.3%
28 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1% 2001 27/31 6.7 3.3 58.3% 72.5% 49.9% 60.8% 30.5% 63.3% 34.5%
29 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3% 2002 34/37 6.4 3.2 61.1% 69.7% 49.7% 60.8% 43.5% 61.7% 32.8%
30 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8% 2003 39/39 8.6 2.7 57.7% 72.8% 52.9% 59.6% 35.3% 64.5% 34.5%
31 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2% 2004 38/38 7.5 2.4 59.4% 72.9% 52.5% 50.7% 34.9% 64.6% 32.7%
32 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7% 2005 21/21 6.3 2.8 56.5% 70.4% 50.8% 62.2% 31.7% 61.7% 34.7%
33 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1% 2006 4/4 7.5 1.3 60.1% 70.9% 56.0% 63.2% 44.6% 65.9% 30.1%
34 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0% 2007 6/6 8.2 1.0 69.0% 74.3% 62.9% 58.7% 31.2% 70.0% 33.8%
35 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6% — 200/214 7.4 2.7 59.0% 71.9% 51.9% 59.9% 36.8% 63.6% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Antony Dupuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 — — 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) 101.0 +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 105.2 -3.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) 100.2 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) 106.2 -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 92.4 +0.69 1996 1513 100.9 -1.78 -0.98 0.835 46.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.05
24 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) 106.6 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) 101.7 -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 91.4 +1.14 1999 1583 123.8 +0.84 -1.08 1.019 50.4% +48 — — 46.7% -0.40 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.49
27 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) 108.6 -1.41 2000 1526 117.0 +0.02 -3.25 0.831 47.5% +31 -34 +15 30.2% -1.12 2–3 (40%) 4–7 (36%) 97.1 -0.44
28 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) 100.3 +2.19 2001 1558 119.9 +1.20 -2.02 0.939 48.8% -41 +42 -80 39.8% -0.57 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 103.4 -0.47
29 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.33 2002 1549 112.7 -1.41 -3.77 0.856 47.6% +14 -41 -100 38.4% -0.87 3–6 (33%) 9–5 (64%) 100.7 +2.11
30 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) 102.6 -1.62 2003 1598 126.0 +1.23 -2.80 0.969 49.5% -12 -74 -78 47.5% -0.23 5–8 (38%) 11–10 (52%) 101.7 +0.52
31 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 -0.08 2004 1599 120.8 +0.82 -3.37 0.925 48.6% 0 -85 -10 46.3% -0.46 5–6 (45%) 15–9 (63%) 101.1 +1.23
32 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) 93.0 +2.82 2005 1608 116.8 -1.11 -1.52 0.907 48.3% -67 -40 +59 35.4% -0.79 0–3 (0%) 3–6 (33%) 94.0 +0.24
33 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -0.03 2006 1570 103.4 +0.73 -2.14 0.881 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.65
34 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 99.2 -0.48 2007 1618 108.8 +0.42 -1.19 1.126 51.9% — — +134 69.2% +0.46 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.87
35 2017 1683 134.2 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +1.50 2008 1580 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1559 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35 — 1687 122.0 +0.28 -2.66 0.924 48.7% -3 -38 -7 42.2% -0.57 25–37 (40%) 63–53 (54%) 101.7 +1.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.