H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Denis Istomin H2H: 3-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 3–1 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 Bangkok fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 27, 2013* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #20 6-3 6-3 Denis Istomin #47 Match data
Jul 3, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #33 6-3 5-7 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 Denis Istomin #39 Match data
Jul 29, 2011* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #14 6-3 6-2 Denis Istomin #80 Match data
Oct 29, 2009* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Denis Istomin #101 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Mikhail Youzhny #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —