H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 1–0 lead over Emil Reinberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2018 Atlanta round of 32 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 6-2 6-0 | Emil Reinberg | Match data | Jul 26, 2018* | R32 | Atlanta | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 482 | 408 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Emil Reinberg | #1,797 | #670 | 33 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mikhail Youzhny | Emil Reinberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1057 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,962 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,838 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,892 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's and 1/1 of Emil Reinberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Mikhail Youzhny | Emil Reinberg | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 1999 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 55.1% | 70.4% | 36.4% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 55.1% | 33.3% | 2018 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 40.7% | 58.3% | 34.3% | 44.4% | 0.0% | 44.1% | 25.6% |
| 2000 | 11/13 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 60.2% | 66.1% | 50.0% | 53.7% | 40.2% | 59.9% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 34/38 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 62.0% | 68.1% | 49.9% | 55.5% | 45.4% | 61.1% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 39/52 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 63.7% | 68.2% | 50.6% | 58.4% | 45.3% | 61.8% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 53/54 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 57.2% | 67.1% | 48.5% | 58.0% | 37.1% | 59.2% | 39.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 63/67 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 57.6% | 72.2% | 52.4% | 59.3% | 42.9% | 63.6% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 44/44 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 57.0% | 70.9% | 53.2% | 51.4% | 50.5% | 63.2% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 44/45 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 58.5% | 69.1% | 51.2% | 56.8% | 43.6% | 61.5% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 68/72 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 59.9% | 73.2% | 53.4% | 63.5% | 45.9% | 65.1% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 43/46 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 62.9% | 72.4% | 52.8% | 69.2% | 48.4% | 65.1% | 38.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 68/68 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 61.9% | 71.9% | 52.9% | 54.5% | 41.4% | 64.6% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 58/59 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 63.4% | 72.1% | 52.3% | 58.7% | 44.5% | 64.9% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 46/46 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 60.7% | 70.1% | 53.0% | 53.9% | 41.5% | 63.4% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 53/55 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 62.1% | 71.8% | 54.6% | 61.1% | 43.6% | 65.1% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 63/63 | 4.4 | 2.5 | 62.2% | 71.0% | 50.7% | 66.4% | 45.0% | 63.3% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 41/42 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 62.7% | 66.9% | 53.0% | 56.4% | 40.9% | 61.6% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 33/33 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 59.2% | 66.7% | 50.2% | 49.6% | 35.8% | 59.6% | 33.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 35/37 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 59.4% | 67.4% | 52.1% | 59.9% | 40.2% | 61.3% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 30/30 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 60.5% | 67.3% | 48.1% | 61.1% | 43.3% | 59.4% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 25/25 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 60.6% | 67.6% | 49.5% | 55.8% | 32.8% | 60.4% | 35.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 852/890 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 60.6% | 70.1% | 51.8% | 58.6% | 43.0% | 62.8% | 38.6% | Career | 1/1 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 40.7% | 58.3% | 34.3% | 44.4% | 0.0% | 44.1% | 25.6% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mikhail Youzhny | Emil Reinberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1999 | 1494 | 101.7 | -2.13 | -1.94 | 0.742 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 2018 | 1492 | 97.5 | -2.50 | -3.44 | 0.458 | 36.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 2000 | 1532 | 116.4 | -1.96 | -1.12 | 0.873 | 47.6% | +26 | — | — | 42.4% | -0.67 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.8 | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1695 | 126.0 | -1.14 | +1.28 | 1.015 | 50.1% | -22 | -188 | -31 | 51.5% | -0.02 | 5–8 (38%) | 13–8 (62%) | 101.0 | +0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1867 | 145.9 | +0.65 | +2.55 | 1.032 | 50.8% | -141 | -102 | -103 | 54.4% | +0.46 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–9 (53%) | 105.2 | -3.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1746 | 135.3 | -1.76 | +1.88 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -42 | +20 | +25 | 50.4% | -0.02 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–9 (53%) | 100.2 | -1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1883 | 148.3 | +0.81 | +2.00 | 1.057 | 50.9% | +22 | -143 | -152 | 58.0% | +0.41 | 15–10 (60%) | 19–14 (58%) | 106.2 | -1.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1761 | 139.5 | +1.26 | +2.88 | 1.104 | 51.5% | +3 | -18 | +10 | 53.6% | +0.39 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–7 (46%) | 92.4 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1827 | 146.7 | -0.47 | +1.85 | 1.025 | 50.4% | +34 | -99 | -76 | 50.0% | -0.04 | 7–3 (70%) | 9–5 (64%) | 106.6 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1890 | 156.9 | +2.28 | +3.67 | 1.144 | 52.4% | +38 | -97 | -62 | 63.0% | +0.84 | 12–9 (57%) | 12–13 (48%) | 101.7 | -1.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1772 | 147.1 | +2.15 | +1.93 | 1.109 | 52.1% | +23 | -16 | +129 | 59.0% | +0.71 | 4–7 (36%) | 9–10 (47%) | 91.4 | +1.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1963 | 152.1 | +1.37 | +2.31 | 1.091 | 51.3% | +17 | -170 | -95 | 55.3% | +0.51 | 17–6 (74%) | 12–16 (43%) | 108.6 | -1.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1944 | 153.8 | +1.60 | +3.59 | 1.144 | 52.5% | +51 | -65 | -122 | 62.6% | +0.83 | 15–9 (63%) | 19–13 (59%) | 100.3 | +2.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1839 | 149.8 | +0.30 | +1.58 | 1.047 | 50.8% | +13 | +8 | +51 | 53.5% | +0.28 | 8–11 (42%) | 9–8 (53%) | 96.9 | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1893 | 159.3 | +1.93 | +3.49 | 1.139 | 52.2% | -5 | -19 | +111 | 56.5% | +0.59 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–12 (45%) | 102.6 | -1.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2015 | 164.9 | +0.69 | +2.03 | 1.041 | 51.0% | -59 | -9 | +84 | 59.5% | +0.53 | 14–8 (64%) | 11–10 (52%) | 102.8 | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1797 | 144.6 | -1.83 | +1.95 | 1.007 | 50.1% | +17 | +64 | +233 | 48.5% | -0.02 | 3–8 (27%) | 7–8 (47%) | 93.0 | +2.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1702 | 140.9 | -2.85 | -2.15 | 0.819 | 46.5% | +90 | -22 | +196 | 30.3% | -1.08 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.9 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1781 | 137.7 | -1.76 | +0.85 | 0.955 | 49.4% | +35 | -167 | +92 | 54.0% | +0.11 | 5–8 (38%) | 8–4 (67%) | 99.2 | -0.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1683 | 134.1 | -3.41 | -0.63 | 0.861 | 47.7% | +46 | -135 | +177 | 43.6% | -0.49 | 2–9 (18%) | 5–4 (56%) | 93.8 | +1.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1651 | 126.8 | -2.94 | -0.47 | 0.887 | 47.6% | +27 | -111 | +190 | 35.0% | -0.88 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.1 | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2069 | 153.2 | +0.17 | +1.94 | 1.036 | 50.6% | +9 | -65 | +30 | 53.8% | +0.27 | 149–141 (51%) | 181–165 (52%) | 100.7 | -0.35 | Career | 1500 | 98.7 | -2.50 | -3.44 | 0.458 | 36.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +4.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 0 | 18 | 18 | Aug 31, 2017 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 4 | 13 | 17 | Aug 14, 2015 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 6 | 7 | 13 | Oct 20, 2012 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 8 | 4 | 12 | Oct 8, 2015 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 3 | 8 | 11 | Sep 4, 2016 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |