H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 5-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–3 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2016 Miami Masters first round 6-4 6-2.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2017* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Mikhail Youzhny #98 4-6 6-1 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #275 Match data
Mar 25, 2016* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #72 6-4 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #78 Match data
Oct 7, 2014* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #35 6-4 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #13 Match data
Aug 13, 2013* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #25 7-5 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #34 Match data
Jan 4, 2012* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #35 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #61 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ernests Gulbis #53 6-2 6-4 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #15 Match data
Nov 10, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ernests Gulbis #26 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Mikhail Youzhny #10 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ernests Gulbis #34 7-6(2) 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data
Oct 11, 2007* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #17 6-3 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10