H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 4-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–3 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on grass, while Fabrice Santoro leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2008 Dubai third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #47 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #12 Match data
Feb 16, 2007* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #22 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #59 Match data
Jun 15, 2006* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Fabrice Santoro #49 7-6(4) 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #38 Match data
Aug 5, 2004* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #42 7-5 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #46 Match data
Jun 13, 2002* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #67 6-0 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #32 Match data
Jul 1, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #85 7-5 6-0 2-0 (ret.) Fabrice Santoro #25 Match data
Oct 26, 2000* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mikhail Youzhny #133 6-4 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6