H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-5
Feliciano Lopez holds a 5–3 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2016 Stuttgart third round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
5
8 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2016* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| May 7, 2014* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Feliciano Lopez | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2011* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-7(5) 6-2 7-5 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2004* | Dubai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2003* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(5) 6-3 6-2 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Sep 12, 2002* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Youzhny | Feliciano Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 |