H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-5

Feliciano Lopez holds a 5–3 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2016 Stuttgart third round 7-6(3) 6-3.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 2016* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #76 7-6(3) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #22 Match data
Oct 11, 2014* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Feliciano Lopez #21 5-7 6-4 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #35 Match data
May 7, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Feliciano Lopez #29 3-6 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #16 Match data
Oct 7, 2011* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #37 6-7(5) 6-2 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #28 Match data
Mar 6, 2004* Dubai ATP 250 SF Hard Feliciano Lopez #32 6-4 4-6 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #57 Match data
Oct 29, 2003* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Feliciano Lopez #28 7-6(4) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #44 Match data
Jun 27, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Feliciano Lopez #52 7-6(5) 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #25 Match data
Sep 12, 2002* Tashkent ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #46 7-6(5) 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7