H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 0-2

Fernando Verdasco holds a 2–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2008 Roland Garros third round 7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #23 7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #15 Match data
May 13, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #28 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7