H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Gilles Muller H2H: 3-4

Gilles Muller holds a 4–3 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Gilles Muller leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2018 Miami Masters second round 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 2018* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #102 4-6 6-4 6-2 Gilles Muller #28 Match data
Feb 10, 2017* Sofia ATP 250 R16 Hard Gilles Muller #29 6-3 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #89 Match data
Jun 23, 2016* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Gilles Muller #41 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #73 Match data
Jun 18, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Gilles Muller #48 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #71 Match data
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Gilles Muller #53 2-6 3-6 7-5 7-6(6) 7-6(6) Mikhail Youzhny #29 Match data
May 27, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #42 7-6(2) 6-1 6-4 Gilles Muller #79 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #30 6-4 6-1 6-0 Gilles Muller #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —