H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 0-2
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 2–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2004 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 7-6(4) 6-2 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2002* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Youzhny | Goran Ivanisevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 |
| 27 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |