H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Guillermo Coria H2H: 2-6

Guillermo Coria holds a 6–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2006 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-1.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 19, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Coria #9 6-3 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #38 Match data
Sep 17, 2005* Beijing ATP 250 QF Hard Guillermo Coria #8 6-4 1-6 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #24 Match data
May 12, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Guillermo Coria #8 6-2 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #24 Match data
Mar 4, 2004* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #57 4-6 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Coria #4 Match data
Aug 16, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Guillermo Coria #5 6-2 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #39 Match data
Jul 19, 2003* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Clay Guillermo Coria #7 6-0 6-0 Mikhail Youzhny #27 Match data
May 17, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Guillermo Coria #16 6-3 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #32 Match data
Oct 25, 2002* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #42 6-4 3-6 6-4 Guillermo Coria #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Guillermo Coria #1,121 #3 3,770 2,114 211 113 65.1% 0 2 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Guillermo Coria
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #88 1,547 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2001 26–15 63.4% #44 1,698 0 1
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2002 22–16 57.9% #45 1,762 0 1
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2003 61–17 78.2% #5 2,009 0 6
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2004 37–15 71.2% #7 1,923 0 8
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2005 49–24 67.1% #8 1,865 0 9
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2006 11–14 44.0% #116 1,671 0 9
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2008 2–8 20.0% #577 1,575 0 9
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10