H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-6

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 6–1 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2013 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-3.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 20, 2013* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #74 6-4 4-6 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #20 Match data
Jul 18, 2013* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #85 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #32 Match data
Sep 22, 2012* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #29 6-4 0-6 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #53 7-5 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #64 Match data
May 22, 2009* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 SF Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #74 6-3 1-6 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #46 Match data
Jul 12, 2008* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #88 4-6 7-5 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #16 Match data
May 17, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #105 6-0 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5