H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 4-2

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 2–1 on grass, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2018 Wimbledon first round 4-6 7-5 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Ivo Karlovic #112 4-6 7-5 7-6(7) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #102 Match data
Jun 22, 2017* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #88 6-3 7-6(6) Ivo Karlovic #24 Match data
Jun 12, 2014* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Ivo Karlovic #33 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #16 Match data
Feb 4, 2012* Zagreb ATP 250 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #39 7-6(10) 3-6 7-6(6) Ivo Karlovic #46 Match data
Jan 5, 2012* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #35 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #56 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #14 6-2 6-4 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8