H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Jan Hernych H2H: 2-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2009 Dubai Tennis Championships first round 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jan Hernych
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Hernych #66 4-6 6-1 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #61 Match data Feb 26, 2009* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #15 (ret.) Jan Hernych #92 Match data May 30, 2007* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mikhail Youzhny #25 7-6(6) 6-2 6-0 Jan Hernych #75 Match data Jan 17, 2007* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Jan Hernych #1,606 #59 1,157 1,783 79 115 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jan Hernych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #272 1,485 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,475 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2 2004 9–12 42.9% #83 1,571 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3 2005 18–22 45.0% #74 1,622 0 0
26 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4 2006 17–20 45.9% #75 1,666 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5 2007 7–15 31.8% #156 1,612 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7 2008 4–8 33.3% #81 1,675 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7 2009 11–23 32.4% #113 1,667 0 0
30 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8 2010 0–1 0.0% #241 1,598 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10 2011 3–2 60.0% #168 1,664 0 0
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10 2012 2–1 66.7% #193 1,606 0 0
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2013 5–5 50.0% #219 1,744 0 0
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10 2014 1–1 50.0% #199 1,701 0 0
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10 2015 2–2 50.0% #286 1,696 0 0
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10 2016 0–1 0.0% #424 1,641 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jan Hernych
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 9 12 21 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5% — 43 59 102 42.2% 13 28 41 31.7% 19 21 40 47.5% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's and 190/194 of Jan Hernych's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jan Hernych
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5% 2000 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.7% 55.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 49.1% 25.0%
21 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4% 2002 1/1 0.0 1.0 63.4% 38.5% 20.0% 40.0% 50.0% 31.7% 33.3%
23 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5% 2004 21/21 3.1 2.0 65.6% 66.1% 49.3% 55.9% 49.3% 60.3% 37.7%
25 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9% 2005 39/40 2.5 2.3 65.8% 64.8% 50.9% 59.0% 44.9% 60.0% 38.0%
26 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8% 2006 36/37 2.7 1.7 66.8% 64.4% 51.4% 55.2% 44.3% 60.0% 40.1%
27 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7% 2007 21/22 3.1 1.6 66.2% 64.5% 49.4% 54.9% 36.1% 59.1% 36.5%
28 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1% 2008 12/12 2.2 2.6 65.3% 59.8% 51.0% 45.2% 47.7% 56.8% 35.1%
29 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3% 2009 34/34 3.0 2.4 65.0% 66.1% 48.1% 59.0% 39.0% 59.7% 35.8%
30 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8% 2010 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 58.7% 65.0% 33.3% 33.3% 61.2% 33.7%
31 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2% 2011 5/5 5.0 2.2 68.7% 64.0% 51.8% 77.2% 32.9% 60.3% 36.9%
32 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7% 2012 3/3 2.3 4.0 56.3% 58.6% 47.0% 64.9% 33.3% 53.2% 39.5%
33 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1% 2013 10/10 4.3 3.2 61.1% 67.6% 51.5% 54.1% 34.9% 61.4% 34.9%
34 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0% 2014 2/2 12.0 1.5 69.2% 71.4% 45.7% 66.2% 35.0% 63.4% 34.7%
35 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0% 2015 3/4 4.3 2.7 66.4% 60.1% 51.5% 63.1% 43.3% 57.2% 36.5%
36 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1% 2016 1/1 6.0 2.0 62.9% 67.9% 36.4% 55.6% 40.0% 56.2% 34.6%
Career — 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6% — 190/194 3.0 2.2 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 56.5% 42.0% 59.4% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jan Hernych
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 — — 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) 101.0 +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 105.2 -3.92 2000 1486 98.6 -2.51 +0.58 0.491 38.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16
21 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) 100.2 -1.28 2001 1474 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) 106.2 -1.36 2002 1476 96.0 -0.28 -1.50 0.488 32.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.02
23 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 92.4 +0.69 2003 1461 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) 106.6 -1.02 2004 1572 131.6 -2.45 +1.84 0.949 49.1% +5 — -15 40.4% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 -0.25
25 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) 101.7 -1.21 2005 1623 129.5 -1.47 +0.65 0.949 49.0% -58 -65 +45 46.2% -0.34 5–7 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 101.9 -0.80
26 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 91.4 +1.14 2006 1667 130.1 -1.41 +2.15 1.001 50.0% -66 -121 +41 47.3% -0.29 3–7 (30%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -0.14
27 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) 108.6 -1.41 2007 1613 131.4 -1.99 +0.62 0.893 47.8% +23 -116 — 36.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–5 (17%) 94.0 -1.47
28 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) 100.3 +2.19 2008 1676 117.5 -2.03 -0.68 0.813 46.8% +19 -154 — 37.5% -1.06 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.14
29 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.33 2009 1668 137.6 -2.02 -0.08 0.888 47.8% +35 -129 +32 35.6% -0.80 5–9 (36%) 2–6 (25%) 94.6 -1.77
30 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) 102.6 -1.62 2010 1598 112.4 -0.83 +1.60 0.867 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
31 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 -0.08 2011 1664 121.9 -0.09 +1.05 0.929 48.7% +47 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–0 1–4 (20%) — -0.39
32 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) 93.0 +2.82 2012 1606 112.1 -2.89 +0.24 0.845 46.8% — +54 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 — — -0.23
33 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -0.03 2013 1745 122.3 -0.81 -0.62 0.905 48.3% — — +148 45.8% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 -0.30
34 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 99.2 -0.48 2014 1702 109.1 +1.00 -1.06 0.949 49.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–1 — 0.00
35 2017 1683 134.2 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +1.50 2015 1696 112.0 -2.26 -1.93 0.853 47.2% — — +192 50.0% -0.63 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.14
36 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.1 +0.38 2016 1641 101.2 +0.27 -3.38 0.789 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1618 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35 — 1783 128.6 -1.68 +0.70 0.918 48.5% -12 -100 +78 41.9% -0.60 28–37 (43%) 32–37 (46%) 95.5 -2.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.