H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 5-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–3 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2016 St. Petersburg third round 6-3 7-5.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 22, 2016* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #53 6-3 7-5 Janko Tipsarevic #227 Match data
Jun 2, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #31 6-4 6-4 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #12 Match data
Aug 9, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #9 7-6(2) 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #30 Match data
Jul 1, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #33 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #8 Match data
Feb 26, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #15 6-3 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #39 Match data
Oct 25, 2009* Moscow ATP 250 F Hard Mikhail Youzhny #30 6-7(5) 6-0 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #46 Match data
Apr 3, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #41 3-6 6-0 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #11 Match data
Feb 21, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #44 7-6(3) 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10