H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 4-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–3 lead over Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2014 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2014* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #25 6-1 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 Match data
Oct 6, 2012* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #28 Match data
Feb 19, 2011* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #11 6-4 2-6 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #16 Match data
Jun 1, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #14 6-2 (ret.) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 Match data
Nov 5, 2009* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #23 6-7(3) 6-0 3-0 (ret.) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #9 Match data
Oct 11, 2009* Tokyo ATP 500 F Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-3 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #49 Match data
Jan 24, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #38 7-5 6-0 7-6(6) Mikhail Youzhny #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 — — — — — — — 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18