H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Juan Monaco H2H: 4-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2014 Moscow fourth round 6-3 7-6(6).

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 2014* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #27 6-3 7-6(6) Juan Monaco #70 Match data
Oct 10, 2014* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #35 5-7 6-3 6-2 Juan Monaco #82 Match data
Jul 27, 2013* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #33 5-7 6-4 7-6(7) Juan Monaco #30 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #17 4-6 6-2 6-2 4-6 6-4 Juan Monaco #43 Match data
Jul 21, 2009* Hamburg ATP 500 R64 Clay Juan Monaco #48 7-6(4) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10