H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-5

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 US Open fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #24 6-3 3-6 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #66 Match data
Aug 14, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #134 6-4 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #28 Match data
Apr 27, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #32 6-4 4-6 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data
Oct 10, 2009* Tokyo ATP 500 SF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #49 6-2 5-7 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #26 Match data
Mar 18, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #24 7-5 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data
Jul 3, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-3 6-3 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #61 Match data
Jun 21, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 5-7 7-6(4) Mikhail Youzhny #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —