H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2010 Australian Open third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | (w/o) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mikhail Youzhny | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |