H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 4-5

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 5–4 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2018 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 2-6 3-1 RET.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main-draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Baghdatis #93 6-4 6-4 2-6 3-1 (ret.) Mikhail Youzhny #106 Match data Aug 29, 2018* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #36 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Mikhail Youzhny #70 Match data Jan 18, 2017* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #67 3-6 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #56 Match data Feb 7, 2015* QF Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #9 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data Oct 2, 2010* QF Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #52 6-2 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #101 Match data Oct 2, 2009* R16 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #44 6-4 7-6(3) Marcos Baghdatis #81 Match data Jun 11, 2009* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Marcos Baghdatis #17 7-6(2) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #8 Match data Feb 16, 2008* QF Marseille International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #17 2-6 7-6(7) 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #22 Match data Feb 17, 2007* QF Marseille International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #34 6-2 3-6 6-1 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #90 Match data Jun 22, 2005* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
31 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5%
32 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2019 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
36 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
Career 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5% 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3% —/—
18 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0% —/—
19 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5% 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8% 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7% 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1% 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3% 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8% 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2% 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7% 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1% 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0% 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%
35 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0% —/—
36 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1% —/—
Career 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6% 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% 0.0% -3.50 -0.07
18 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -0.21 2003 1485 100.2
19 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) 101.0 +0.55 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 -0.09
20 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 105.2 -3.92 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) 101.2 -0.74
21 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) 100.2 -1.28 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) 105.9 -1.44
22 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) 106.2 -1.36 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) 107.4 -0.34
23 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 92.4 +0.69 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) 97.2 -0.74
24 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) 106.6 -1.02 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) 91.3 -0.90
25 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) 101.7 -1.21 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) 103.7 -0.06
26 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 91.4 +1.14 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) 97.1 -0.79
27 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) 108.6 -1.41 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) 101.4 -1.33
28 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) 100.3 +2.19 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 86.4 -2.69
29 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.33 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.23
30 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) 102.6 -1.62 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) 105.0 -0.74
31 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 -0.08 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 100.2 -2.18
32 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) 93.0 +2.82 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) 104.3 -0.55
33 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -0.03 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 +0.39
34 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 99.2 -0.48 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) +0.56
35 2017 1683 134.2 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +1.50
36 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.1 +0.38
Career 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.