H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Mardy Fish H2H: 3-0

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 3–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2012 Dubai fourth round 6-2 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 1, 2012* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #34 6-2 7-6(0) Mardy Fish #8 Match data
Mar 31, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #15 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Mardy Fish #101 Match data
Jan 18, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #58 6-4 6-3 6-2 Mardy Fish #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 — — — — — — —
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —