H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Michael Llodra H2H: 1-5

Michael Llodra holds a 5–1 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Llodra leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2011 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-5 3-6 7-6(4).

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Michael Llodra #32 7-5 3-6 7-6(4) Mikhail Youzhny #17 Match data
Aug 10, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Michael Llodra #31 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) Mikhail Youzhny #14 Match data
Feb 21, 2009* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Llodra #50 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Mikhail Youzhny #62 Match data
Jan 15, 2004* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Llodra #119 6-4 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #45 Match data
Jan 16, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #58 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 6-3 Michael Llodra #84 Match data
May 3, 2001* Mallorca ATP 250 R32 Clay Michael Llodra #121 6-2 4-6 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,901 182 215 45.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,598 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,602 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,620 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,734 0 1
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,640 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2008 21–19 52.5% #40 1,725 0 3
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,738 0 3
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,879 0 5
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,842 0 5
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,787 0 5
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,688 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10