H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 5-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–1 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 Shanghai Masters second round 3-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2016* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #45 3-6 6-2 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #51 Match data
May 8, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #31 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #37 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #11 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #17 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #15 Match data
May 8, 2009* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #64 7-6(2) 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #26 Match data
Apr 1, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #11 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(6) Nicolas Almagro #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —