H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-4

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 4–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on clay, while Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2010 Halle third round 4-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 2010* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Nicolas Kiefer #181 4-6 6-1 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #14 Match data
Jul 24, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #37 7-6(4) 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #16 Match data
Jun 13, 2008* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Nicolas Kiefer #38 6-2 5-7 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #18 Match data
Oct 18, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #112 6-1 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #18 Match data
May 12, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #44 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #33 Match data
Apr 18, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #86 6-3 6-0 Nicolas Kiefer #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —