H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 3-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2007 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2009 Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Clay Nicolas Lapentti #95 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #72 Match data
May 31, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #15 6-3 6-0 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #65 Match data
Jul 24, 2003* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #64 6-3 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #35 Match data
Jul 17, 2003* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #27 6-3 2-6 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #64 Match data
Jul 19, 2002* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #62 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —