H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 4-0

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-5 6-4.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 5, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #82 6-2 7-5 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #78 Match data
May 13, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #16 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #39 Match data
Aug 28, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #24 6-4 6-4 7-6(4) Nicolas Mahut #78 Match data
Feb 1, 2007* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mikhail Youzhny #22 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4