H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 4-0
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-2 7-5 6-4 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| May 13, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-4 7-6(4) | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2007* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Youzhny | Nicolas Mahut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |