H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 5-2

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–2 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 Gstaad third round 6-3 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 2013* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #33 6-3 4-6 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #101 Match data
Jun 24, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Paul-Henri Mathieu #66 6-4 2-6 2-6 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #14 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #60 2-6 7-5 6-0 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #27 Match data
Jul 16, 2009* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Paul-Henri Mathieu #39 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Mikhail Youzhny #72 Match data
May 9, 2009* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #64 7-5 3-6 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #39 Match data
Jun 12, 2003* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #29 1-6 6-1 5-2 (ret.) Paul-Henri Mathieu #56 Match data
Jul 26, 2002* Sopot ATP 250 R16 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #44 2-6 6-0 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —