H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 3-4

Radek Stepanek holds a 4–3 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–0 on clay, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2014 Roland Garros second round 6-0 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Radek Stepanek #43 6-0 6-3 3-6 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #16 Match data
May 2, 2013* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #48 6-4 5-7 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #31 Match data
Jun 16, 2012* Halle ATP 500 QF Grass Mikhail Youzhny #31 6-4 4-6 6-4 Radek Stepanek #26 Match data
Jun 29, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #17 7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 Radek Stepanek #15 Match data
Nov 7, 2004* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Radek Stepanek #63 7-6(1) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #20 Match data
Mar 19, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #50 6-3 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #26 Match data
Jan 3, 2003* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #32 6-3 6-1 Radek Stepanek #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5