H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 2-2

Mikhail Youzhny and Teymuraz Gabashvili are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2016 Eastbourne Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mikhail Youzhny #73 4-6 6-3 6-3 Teymuraz Gabashvili #104 Match data Jun 21, 2016* R64 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Teymuraz Gabashvili #59 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #62 Match data Feb 5, 2009* R32 Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Teymuraz Gabashvili #66 7-5 4-6 7-6(1) Mikhail Youzhny #22 Match data Oct 9, 2008* R32 Moscow International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #17 3-6 6-3 6-3 Teymuraz Gabashvili #71 Match data Mar 22, 2007* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0
22 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0
26 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0
30 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5% — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's and 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5% 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5%
20 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5% 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5%
21 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4% 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2%
22 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4% 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5%
23 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7% 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9%
24 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5% 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6%
25 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9% 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9%
26 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8% 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4%
27 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7% 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8%
28 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1% 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8%
29 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3% 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9%
30 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8% 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4%
31 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2% 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5%
32 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7% 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6%
33 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6% — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 — — 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) 101.0 +0.55 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04
20 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 105.2 -3.92 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05
21 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) 100.2 -1.28 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08
22 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) 106.2 -1.36 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15
23 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 92.4 +0.69 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30
24 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) 106.6 -1.02 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33
25 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) 101.7 -1.21 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07
26 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 91.4 +1.14 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17
27 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) 108.6 -1.41 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59
28 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) 100.3 +2.19 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01
29 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.33 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72
30 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) 102.6 -1.62 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36
31 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 -0.08 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50
32 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) 93.0 +2.82 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47
33 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -0.03 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 99.2 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1683 134.1 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +1.50 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.1 +0.38 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35 — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.