H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 2-2

Mikhail Youzhny and Teymuraz Gabashvili are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2016 Nottingham second round 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2016* Nottingham ATP 250 R64 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #73 4-6 6-3 6-3 Teymuraz Gabashvili #104 Match data
Feb 5, 2009* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Hard Teymuraz Gabashvili #59 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #62 Match data
Oct 9, 2008* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Hard Teymuraz Gabashvili #66 7-5 4-6 7-6(1) Mikhail Youzhny #22 Match data
Mar 22, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #17 3-6 6-3 6-3 Teymuraz Gabashvili #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,836 109 194 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,459 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,519 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,557 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,688 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2014 17–25 40.5% #67 1,732 0 0
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,774 0 0
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2016 10–21 32.3% #138 1,640 0 0
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,540 0 0
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —