H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 3-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 3–1 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mikhail Youzhny #22 7-5 6-2 Thomas Johansson #66 Match data Aug 13, 2008* R32 Beijing Olympics Olympics Hard
Thomas Johansson #64 (w/o) Mikhail Youzhny #23 Match data Oct 27, 2006* R16 St. Petersburg ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Mikhail Youzhny #17 7-6(3) 6-1 Thomas Johansson #25 Match data Feb 24, 2005* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Mikhail Youzhny #133 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) Thomas Johansson #60 Match data Oct 27, 2000* R16 Moscow ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4
26 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8
30 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Thomas Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
22 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
23 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5% — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's and 214/218 of Thomas Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Thomas Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3% 2004 49/49 9.3 2.1 55.5% 77.2% 52.5% 62.8% 42.3% 66.2% 36.3%
30 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8% 2005 66/66 8.9 2.0 56.8% 77.3% 55.7% 59.6% 40.9% 68.0% 36.5%
31 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2% 2006 26/27 10.2 2.8 56.6% 75.4% 50.5% 61.8% 40.1% 64.6% 33.3%
32 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7% 2007 46/46 8.4 2.5 57.6% 74.9% 51.6% 60.3% 42.1% 65.1% 32.1%
33 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1% 2008 27/30 7.4 2.8 58.4% 72.2% 47.4% 60.8% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5%
34 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6% — 214/616 8.9 2.3 56.9% 75.9% 52.4% 60.9% 41.0% 65.8% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Thomas Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 — — 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -0.21 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12
19 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) 101.0 +0.55 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29
20 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 105.2 -3.92 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10
21 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) 100.2 -1.28 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) 103.6 +0.21
22 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) 106.2 -1.36 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) 91.8 +2.54
23 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 92.4 +0.69 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) 98.8 -1.44
24 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) 106.6 -1.02 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 99.5 +1.29
25 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) 101.7 -1.21 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) 100.3 -0.07
26 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 91.4 +1.14 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) 102.6 -2.47
27 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) 108.6 -1.41 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 97.6 -0.26
28 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) 100.3 +2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.33 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 104.6 -2.69
30 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) 102.6 -1.62 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 103.3 +0.08
31 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 -0.08 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) 92.2 +0.60
32 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) 93.0 +2.82 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) 101.2 -2.55
33 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -0.03 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 98.1 -1.34
34 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 99.2 -0.48 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1683 134.2 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35 — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.