H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 4-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–3 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2015 Canada Masters second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2015* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #107 6-3 7-5 Viktor Troicki #19 Match data
Oct 2, 2014* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Viktor Troicki #152 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #33 Match data
Jun 30, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #26 6-3 6-4 7-5 Viktor Troicki #44 Match data
Oct 9, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Viktor Troicki #32 6-3 2-6 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #30 Match data
May 30, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #14 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 Viktor Troicki #41 Match data
Apr 22, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #72 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-3 Viktor Troicki #36 Match data
Mar 14, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Viktor Troicki #41 7-5 2-1 (ret.) Mikhail Youzhny #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 — — — — — — —