H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny vs Vladimir Voltchkov H2H: 2-1
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over Vladimir Voltchkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2002 St. Petersburg semifinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2002* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-3 | Vladimir Voltchkov | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2002* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Vladimir Voltchkov | 6-1 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-3 6-7(9) 7-6(8) 7-5 | Vladimir Voltchkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Vladimir Voltchkov | #1,605 | #25 | 1,108 | 1,784 | 50 | 68 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mikhail Youzhny | Vladimir Voltchkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #46 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |