H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 2-3

Younes El Aynaoui holds a 3–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Younes El Aynaoui leads 3–1 on clay, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2002 St. Petersburg third round 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 2002* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #42 3-6 6-4 6-3 Younes El Aynaoui #21 Match data
Jul 20, 2002* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #62 6-3 6-2 Younes El Aynaoui #17 Match data
May 4, 2002* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Younes El Aynaoui #19 4-6 7-5 7-6(3) Mikhail Youzhny #77 Match data
Apr 13, 2002* Casablanca ATP 250 SF Clay Younes El Aynaoui #20 6-3 7-6(2) Mikhail Youzhny #75 Match data
Jul 20, 2001* Amsterdam ATP 250 R16 Clay Younes El Aynaoui #74 6-2 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 243 219 52.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Younes El Aynaoui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 1992 2–1 66.7% #311 1,519 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,632 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,515 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,561 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,569 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,727 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,714 0 1
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,822 0 2
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,828 0 5
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2004 0–4 0.0% #644 1,739 0 5
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,597 0 5
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,610 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,617 0 5
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,688 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,679 0 5