H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Milan Holecek vs Frank Froehling H2H: 2-1
Milan Holecek holds a 2–1 lead over Frank Froehling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milan Holecek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Frank Froehling leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Milan Holecek won the 1974 Tuscon second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 82
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1974* | Tuscon | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Milan Holecek | 6-4 6-4 | Frank Froehling | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1972* | Roanoke | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Frank Froehling | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Milan Holecek | Match data |
| Dec 18, 1971* | Kingston | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Milan Holecek | 6-3 6-4 | Frank Froehling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milan Holecek | #322 | #71 | 0 | 1,721 | 116 | 157 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Frank Froehling | #282 | #67 | 0 | 1,840 | 83 | 117 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milan Holecek | Frank Froehling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–28 | 49.1% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1972 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 21–31 | 40.4% | #87 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 44–31 | 58.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #90 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 13–35 | 27.1% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1975 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #102 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #72 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1976 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #225 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |