H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Miloslav Mecir vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-0
Miloslav Mecir holds a 2–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1987 Hamburg third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1987* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Miloslav Mecir | 6-3 6-3 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 6-1 6-3 6-0 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miloslav Mecir | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |