H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Miloslav Mecir vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-1
Miloslav Mecir and Danie Visser are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 1–0 on clay, while Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1985 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Miloslav Mecir | 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Danie Visser | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Miloslav Mecir | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miloslav Mecir | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |