H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Miloslav Mecir vs Diego Perez H2H: 2-0
Miloslav Mecir holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1988 Orlando third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1988* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 6-3 6-2 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1984* | Palermo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Miloslav Mecir | 7-6 5-7 6-0 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miloslav Mecir | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |