H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Miloslav Mecir vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-2
Paul Annacone holds a 2–0 lead over Miloslav Mecir in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1986 Dallas fourth round 6-7 6-2 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1986* | Dallas | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Annacone | 6-7 6-2 6-3 7-6 | Miloslav Mecir | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1985* | Delray Beach | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 6-2 7-6 | Miloslav Mecir | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miloslav Mecir | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |