H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Miloslav Mecir vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-2

Paul Annacone holds a 2–0 lead over Miloslav Mecir in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1986 Dallas round of 16 6-7 6-2 6-3 7-6.

SVK Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Annacone #14 6-7 6-2 6-3 7-6 Miloslav Mecir #11 Match data Apr 11, 1986* R16 Dallas ATP 250 Carpet
Paul Annacone #94 6-2 7-6 Miloslav Mecir #29 Match data Feb 6, 1985* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miloslav Mecir #116 #4 677 2,180 238 108 68.8% 0 1 0 0 2 8 11
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miloslav Mecir Paul Annacone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1983 11–5 68.8% #100 1,657 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
20 1984 22–19 53.7% #50 1,675 0 0 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0
21 1985 34–14 70.8% #9 1,782 0 2 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0
22 1986 40–17 70.2% #9 1,929 0 3 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2
23 1987 68–18 79.1% #6 1,978 0 9 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2
24 1988 35–13 72.9% #13 1,967 0 10 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2
25 1989 19–14 57.6% #18 1,867 0 11 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2
26 1990 9–8 52.9% #116 1,816 0 11 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miloslav Mecir Paul Annacone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 7 4 11 63.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1986 8 2 10 80.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1%
23 1987 19 3 22 86.4% 26 6 32 81.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
24 1988 20 7 27 74.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1989 14 4 18 77.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 75 27 102 73.5% 84 38 122 68.9% 32 17 49 65.3% 47 26 73 64.4% 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miloslav Mecir Paul Annacone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1983 1658 124.6 -49 -2 58.5% +0.49 6–2 (75%) 1–1 +0.89 1982 1492 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.01
20 1984 1676 132.5 -2 +17 -83 50.0% -0.01 7–5 (58%) 6–6 (50%) +1.95 1983 1534 110.6 +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) +1.07
21 1985 1783 156.3 -13 +58 66.1% +1.32 7–5 (58%) 9–10 (47%) -0.16 1984 1584 121.3 -44 +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) +0.74
22 1986 1930 155.8 -45 -26 -204 64.7% +1.17 8–7 (53%) 5–7 (42%) -1.55 1985 1883 150.0 +31 -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) +0.51
23 1987 1978 164.5 +64 +9 -122 73.6% +1.62 8–3 (73%) 9–4 (69%) -1.35 1986 1783 144.2 +8 -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) -1.82
24 1988 1968 153.7 +16 -1 -34 68.1% +1.35 7–3 (70%) 11–8 (58%) -1.78 1987 1824 150.8 +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) -3.01
25 1989 1868 150.9 +145 -45 +47 58.9% +0.79 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) -1.02 1988 1785 136.2 -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) -0.06
26 1990 1817 137.7 +142 +91 55.3% +0.11 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) -0.20 1989 1732 134.3 -17 +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) -0.38
27 1990 1651 127.7 +8 +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) -0.79
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 +0.29
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) -0.03
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% 0.0% -3.00 0.00
Career 2181 158.7 +42 +6 -65 64.6% +1.08 49–30 (62%) 48–41 (54%) 104.8 -0.94 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.